On Thursday 29 December 2005 12:29, Jakub Moc wrote:
> For your reference, I even cared to attach a patch for horde (among tens of
> other bugs filed for dev-lang/php compitibility) - but that patch never
> made it to portage, despite the bug has been marked as fixed.
that's because the way i chan
29.12.2005, 14:20:37, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 29 December 2005 08:06, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Maybe you could rather have used those 5 minutes you had spent writing your
>> mail to fix horde ebuilds/eclass instead. They have been broken with
>> dev-lang/php ever since it came into portage
On Thursday 29 December 2005 08:06, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Maybe you could rather have used those 5 minutes you had spent writing your
> mail to fix horde ebuilds/eclass instead. They have been broken with
> dev-lang/php ever since it came into portage. :P
speaking of dicks, i knew i hadnt heard from
29.12.2005, 12:52:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[rant omitted]
Maybe you could rather have used those 5 minutes you had spent writing your
mail to fix horde ebuilds/eclass instead. They have been broken with
dev-lang/php ever since it came into portage. :P
Have a nice day...
--
Best regards,
Ja
On Thursday 29 December 2005 06:35, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:13 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i dont really see this being an issue ... i dont think anyone really
> > has 'xml -xml2' or '-xml xml2' ... much more likely they have 'xml
> > xml2' or '-xml -xml2'
>
> I feel r
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 14:13 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i dont really see this being an issue ... i dont think anyone really
> has 'xml -xml2' or '-xml xml2' ... much more likely they have 'xml
> xml2' or '-xml -xml2'
> -mike
And what about PHP users, who will see their SAX parsers disappear,
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:58:03PM +, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 23:48 +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> > /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
> > (version 1)
> >
> > I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all
> > oth
Stuart Herbert wrote:
>
> I can see where you're coming from, but I'm not sure it's worth the
> potential disruption that this will cause our users.
>
> Unless I'm missing something, won't every user who has any form of
> USE=xml, USE=-xml, USE=xml2, or USE=-xml2 in make.conf and packages.use
>
Hi,
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 23:48 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
> (version 1)
>
> I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all
> other alternatives for xml support than dev-libs/libxml. Maybe something
>
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 02:55, Duncan wrote:
> What about doing with xml what was done with gtk, when gtk2 was
> deprecated? IOW, where both are possible, default to one or the other,
> which ever one is merged, or choose one (preferably making it a
> Gentoo-wide default, for consistency) if b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Better to use the correct list:
>
> $ metascan -av IUSE xml IUSE xml2
> Generating package list ... done
> Scanning packages for ['IUSE', 'IUSE'] ... done
>
> media-libs/libwmf-0.2.8.3-r1
> net-fs/samba-3.0.20-r1
> net-fs/samba-3.0.14a-r3
> net-f
On Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:19:01 +0200
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> >
> >>/usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML
> >>library (version 1)
> >>
> >>I think the xml use
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 04:04:55PM -0700, Lares Moreau wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 00:19 +0200, Petteri R?ty wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test/java $ qgrep -v IUSE | grep xml2 | grep -e
> > "xml[^2]"
> > dev-tcltk/tclxml/tclxml-3.0.ebuild: IUSE="expat threads xml2"
> > media-libs/libwmf/libwm
On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 00:19 +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/test/java $ qgrep -v IUSE | grep xml2 | grep -e "xml[^2]"
> dev-tcltk/tclxml/tclxml-3.0.ebuild: IUSE="expat threads xml2"
> media-libs/libwmf/libwmf-0.2.8.3-r1.ebuild: IUSE="jpeg X xml xml2 debug
> doc gtk"
> net-misc/site
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 12:19:01AM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> >
> >>/usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
> >>(version 1)
> >>
> >>I think the xml use flag should be more
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
>
>>/usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
>>(version 1)
>>
>>I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all
>>other alternatives for xml support than dev
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 11:48:52PM +0200, Petteri R??ty wrote:
> /usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
> (version 1)
>
> I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all
> other alternatives for xml support than dev-libs/libxml. Maybe something
/usr/portage/profiles/use.desc:xml - Check/Support flag for XML library
(version 1)
I think the xml use flag should be more generic. There are after all
other alternatives for xml support than dev-libs/libxml. Maybe something
like Adds xml support?
Regards,
Petteri
signature.asc
Description: Op
18 matches
Mail list logo
