Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:41:52 + Bryan Østergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | 2. There's been some concern that things said in private has been > | leaked. > > You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, and > say things that they don't want oth

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Alec Warner
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:12:56 -0700 Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the > | > logged meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain > | > private IRC channel. > | > | You're just pissy b

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 04:30:15PM +, Ferris McCormick wrote: > > A very few discussions must be private: Consider that except for some > documentation and policy, our only "product" is developers and the > interactions among them, really. Now, if we were of one mind, there > would be no pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Ferris McCormick
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 15:39 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:12:56 -0700 Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | > Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the > | > logged meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain > | > private IRC c

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:27:30PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the logged > meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain private IRC > channel. It wouldn't make sense to discuss stuff that is restricted to devs/devrel i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 07:12:56 -0700 Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | > Uh, read again. You missed the point. I'm not talking about the | > logged meetings here. I'm talking about the goings on in a certain | > private IRC channel. | | You're just pissy because you weren't invited to the par

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Josh Saddler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:29:14 -0400 Michael Cummings > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > | > You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, > | > and sa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 06:29:14 -0400 Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: | > You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, | > and say things that they don't want other developers to know? I'm | > shocked, I say,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Michael Cummings
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 11:08 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, and > say things that they don't want other developers to know? I'm shocked, > I say, shocked! > Yes, that's right, those secret meetings that you can get copies of the irc

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-04 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:41:52 + Bryan Østergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | 2. There's been some concern that things said in private has been | leaked. You mean devrel still hold secret meetings behind people's backs, and say things that they don't want other developers to know? I'm shocked, I

[gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

2006-10-03 Thread Bryan Østergaard
Hi all. Jon Portnoy (avenj) recently resigned from Developer Relations. In that regard we had a meeting yesterday discussing the various issues from that. The (very) short summary is: 1. We've decided that I'm going to remain as the single devrel lead and that I will appoint assistants if and whe