В Вск, 07/02/2010 в 21:24 -0500, Mike Frysinger пишет:
> it might also be useful to add a default epatch() to the initial env that
> would be clobbered when the inherit occurred.
> epatch() { die "you need to inherit eutils.eclass to use epatch" ; }
After fixing breakage that was introduced
Le 08/02/2010 03:24, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> if we wanted to specifically target semi-common errors (and i think 'epatch'
> w/out eutils.eclass falls into this category), then a repoman check would be
> good.
>
> it might also be useful to add a default epatch() to the initial env that
> wou
On Sunday 07 February 2010 17:19:43 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 02/07/2010 01:10 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be a good idea to use "set -e" in the ebuild environment ?
> > I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
> > which compiled and installed (apparently
On Sunday 07 February 2010 16:10:10 Stelian Ionescu wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to use "set -e" in the ebuild environment ?
> I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
> which compiled and installed (apparently) fine but possibly broken
> binaries.
this is no
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:19 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 02/07/2010 01:10 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be a good idea to use "set -e" in the ebuild environment ?
> > I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
> > which compiled and installed (apparently)
El 07/02/2010, a las 18:19, Zac Medico escribió:
On 02/07/2010 01:10 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to use "set -e" in the ebuild
environment ?
I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from
eutils
which compiled and installed (apparently) fine but
On 02/07/2010 01:10 PM, Stelian Ionescu wrote:
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to use "set -e" in the ebuild environment ?
> I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
> which compiled and installed (apparently) fine but possibly broken
> binaries. Examples of cases where
Wouldn't it be a good idea to use "set -e" in the ebuild environment ?
I've seen cases of ebuilds calling epatch without inheriting from eutils
which compiled and installed (apparently) fine but possibly broken
binaries. Examples of cases where "set -e" would have helped: 303849,
297063, 260279, 22
