On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> Doesn't work on my non-gentoo OS..Perhaps we should provide debs and rpms? :)
That sounds like a separate bug. We provide handbooks for that one. :)
Rich
(And yes, as I noted in my original post I realize that certs from a
"real" CA would b
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>> I think it's really quite silly that we keep inconveniencing ourselves
>> and our user by not having proper certificates that get recognized by
>> all the major browsers, preferably w
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> My knee-jerk reaction is that your browser has a bug. It thinks that
> it is appropriate to sound alarms for unauthenticated SSL connections
> but not for unauthenticated non-SSL connections. A workaround is to
> emerge ca-certificates.
>
> T
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> I think it's really quite silly that we keep inconveniencing ourselves
> and our user by not having proper certificates that get recognized by
> all the major browsers, preferably wildcard variants (particularly for
> Bugzilla attachments).
Hi,
IIRC, we currently don't have CA-certified SSL certificates on Gentoo
properties because the infrastructure people who handle that kind of
stuff really dislike giving up their personal information to a
corporation like a CA. Would it be possible to break that logjam by
volunteering for the job
