Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla whine mail "spam"

2012-06-23 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Michael Weber schrieb: > On 06/23/2012 09:59 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote: >> Again: Don't take it too serious, if it helps to remind you that's >> fine but ignore anything else. > > It'd be cool to exclude STABLEREQs, but I support the reminder > characteristic. I think STABLEREQs should not be t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla whine mail "spam"

2012-06-23 Thread Michael Weber
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/23/2012 09:59 PM, Christian Ruppert wrote: > Again: Don't take it too serious, if it helps to remind you that's > fine but ignore anything else. It'd be cool to exclude STABLEREQs, but I support the reminder characteristic. - -- Gentoo Dev ht

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla whine mail "spam"

2012-06-23 Thread Christian Ruppert
On 06/23/12 at 09:37PM +0200, Christian Ruppert wrote: > Guys, > > that was a test. I didn't expect it to write "You will get this message once a > day until you've dealt with these" so don't take it too serious. I'm sorry > about > that but i just saw that *a lot* of bugs have been changed from

[gentoo-dev] Bugzilla whine mail "spam"

2012-06-23 Thread Christian Ruppert
Guys, that was a test. I didn't expect it to write "You will get this message once a day until you've dealt with these" so don't take it too serious. I'm sorry about that but i just saw that *a lot* of bugs have been changed from CONFIRMED to IN_PROGRESS.. sorry.. but *that* is more than just wro