Re: [gentoo-dev] Boost maintenance

2010-12-12 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/12/10 9:57 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > Can you please tell me which box ( I'd prefer an amd64 one ) are you > using for chromium? If it is in a working state I will ask for access > again! I'm using miranda. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Boost maintenance

2010-12-12 Thread Markos Chandras
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 06:10:49PM -0500, ross smith wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 15:19, Markos Chandras wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:20:51PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > > A few months ago I spent some time bringing dev-libs/boost up to date > > > because it was blocking some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Boost maintenance

2010-12-12 Thread ross smith
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 15:19, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:20:51PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > > A few months ago I spent some time bringing dev-libs/boost up to date > > because it was blocking some Python issues. Sebastian Luther helped me > > out (I more or less pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Boost maintenance

2010-12-12 Thread Markos Chandras
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 09:42:24PM +0100, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > On 12/12/10 9:19 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > > However, I do not have the hardware to perform any kind of build > > testing to this package because it requires a significant amount of > > resources during compilation phase. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Boost maintenance

2010-12-12 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/12/10 9:19 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > However, I do not have the hardware to perform any kind of build > testing to this package because it requires a significant amount of > resources during compilation phase. Note that Gentoo has some machines for development purposes, see http://www.gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Boost maintenance

2010-12-12 Thread Christopher Harvey
On 2010-12-12, at 3:19 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:20:51PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: >> A few months ago I spent some time bringing dev-libs/boost up to date >> because it was blocking some Python issues. Sebastian Luther helped me >> out (I more or less proxied

Re: [gentoo-dev] Boost maintenance

2010-12-12 Thread Markos Chandras
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 09:20:51PM +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > A few months ago I spent some time bringing dev-libs/boost up to date > because it was blocking some Python issues. Sebastian Luther helped me > out (I more or less proxied from his overlay [2]). However, since I > have no intrinsic

[gentoo-dev] Boost maintenance

2010-12-09 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
A few months ago I spent some time bringing dev-libs/boost up to date because it was blocking some Python issues. Sebastian Luther helped me out (I more or less proxied from his overlay [2]). However, since I have no intrinsic interest in Boost, I have found it hard to find time to keep maintaining