On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 12:25 PM, W. Trevor King wrote:
> In other words, “Why force folks to do this if there is no benefit?”.
> This is understandable, but I think the broken binary packages [1] are
> enough of a visible benefit.
I certainly agree. As I bump my own packages I'll certainly be
l
Over on #gentoo-releng and in gentoo-catalyst@ we've been running into
binary package dependency problems [1]. Before EAPI-5 and sub-slots,
the version of dependency packages is not recorded in the binary
package metadata (the Packages file). For example, a binary package
for GCC built against mp
