Robert Buchholz wrote:
> On Saturday 23 May 2009, Roy Marples wrote:
>> Basically as Doug said, each OpenRC version comes with a few big
>> chances. Well not massive as in "your box will break now", but just a
>> different spin on how things should work. OpenRC-0.5 will have the
>> biggest re-spin
On Saturday 23 May 2009, Roy Marples wrote:
> Basically as Doug said, each OpenRC version comes with a few big
> chances. Well not massive as in "your box will break now", but just a
> different spin on how things should work. OpenRC-0.5 will have the
> biggest re-spin to date - net.lo (net.eth0 et
# Assign static IP addresses and run custom scripts per interface.
# Seperate commands with ;
# Prefix with ! to run a shell script.
# Use \$int to represent the interface
#ifconfig_eth0="192.168.0.10 netmask 255.255.255.0"
# You also have ifup_eth0 and ifdown_eth0 to run other commands when
# et
Mike Auty wrote:
> Roy Marples wrote:
>> Attached is the new conf.d/net sample.
>
> Sorry, I missed those. Did lists.g.o remove them, or were they not
> attached?
>
>> As such, a side project I've started is a new ifconfig tool
>> [1] to handle everything from vlans, to bridging, to bonding, to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roy Marples wrote:
> Attached is the new conf.d/net sample.
Sorry, I missed those. Did lists.g.o remove them, or were they not
attached?
> As such, a side project I've started is a new ifconfig tool
> [1] to handle everything from vlans, to bridging
Roy Marples wrote:
> One side effect of this is that daemons such was wpa_supplicant and PPP
> are now init scripts proper - this is good. The only downside is that
> you lose the ability to control each interface via init.d. Instead I
> propose you control this via ifconfig.
Uh, so in summary any
Alin Năstac wrote:
> Doug Goldstein wrote:
>> The only reason why OpenRC has not come up for stabilization by it's
>> maintainers is the fact that everytime there's a new version readied
>> for release, on the horizon there's new incompatible changes being
>> planned for the next version. The OpenR
Doug Goldstein wrote:
> The only reason why OpenRC has not come up for stabilization by it's
> maintainers is the fact that everytime there's a new version readied
> for release, on the horizon there's new incompatible changes being
> planned for the next version. The OpenRC maintainers in Gentoo h
On Saturday 23 of May 2009 10:53:49 Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 22 May 2009, Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> > Haven't tested it yet on my box, but i'd like to know if openrc
> > handles 801.2Q support.
>
> Near as I can tell, it does (some lines shortened for brevity):
>
> [r...@sareth ~]#
Hi!
On Fri, 22 May 2009, Dawid Węgliński wrote:
> Haven't tested it yet on my box, but i'd like to know if openrc
> handles 801.2Q support.
Near as I can tell, it does (some lines shortened for brevity):
[r...@sareth ~]# eix -Ic openrc
[I] sys-apps/openrc (0.4.3...@05/15/2009): OpenRC manages t
On Friday 22 of May 2009 12:17:17 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to collect some things we need to do before Baselayout 2 and
> OpenRC can go stable. Up to now I have:
>
> * eselect 1.1 stable (current RC3) for the support in the rc module
> * a newer splashutils stable
> * documen
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to collect some things we need to do before Baselayout 2 and
> OpenRC can go stable. Up to now I have:
>
> * eselect 1.1 stable (current RC3) for the support in the rc module
> * a newer splashutils stable
> * documen
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:17 AM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to collect some things we need to do before Baselayout 2 and
> OpenRC can go stable. Up to now I have:
>
> * eselect 1.1 stable (current RC3) for the support in the rc module
> * a newer splashutils stable
> * documen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> What else? As some of you might foresee, this can be as hard as a
> major GCC stabilisation, so it must be well-planned and organised.
Depends on which version of openrc gets stabilized in the process.
We're currently wo
Hi,
I'd like to collect some things we need to do before Baselayout 2 and
OpenRC can go stable. Up to now I have:
* eselect 1.1 stable (current RC3) for the support in the rc module
* a newer splashutils stable
* documentation updates (http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988, thanks Jeremy)
What else? A
15 matches
Mail list logo
