Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-04-01 Thread schism
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 11:58:17AM +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: | With that bug fixed by now is there still need for a news entry? I don't think I make that call, but if the current plastering-over would generally keep existing setups from breaking, I'm happier.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-03-30 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/30/2012 10:56 AM, Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote: Excerpts from Samuli Suominen's message of 2012-03-29 19:59:17 +0200: I've been told dracut is able to handle this. Unverified. Dracut doesn't need anything built static. Thanks for verifying. Expected nothing less. I've reopened the bug[1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-03-30 Thread Amadeusz Żołnowski
Excerpts from Samuli Suominen's message of 2012-03-29 19:59:17 +0200: > I've been told dracut is able to handle this. Unverified. Dracut doesn't need anything built static. -- Amadeusz Żołnowski signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-03-29 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 03/29/2012 12:58 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: On 03/22/2012 03:20 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: [1] For one, genkernel should bomb out if it can't comply with a command-line arg instead of just putting non-alert text up. There is already a bug open about this issue: https://bugs.gentoo.or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-03-29 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 03/22/2012 03:20 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: >> [1] For one, genkernel should bomb out if it can't comply with a >> command-line arg instead of just putting non-alert text up. > > There is already a bug open about this issue: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409277 With that bug f

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-03-22 Thread Maxim Kammerer
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 15:48, wrote: > Please - if you're going to significantly change functionality that > (whether correct or not) people have come to depend on, have the decency > to at least publish a news article on it. Previous stable cryptsetup had an "if use dynamic" warning in pkg_set

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-03-22 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 07:48 -0600, sch...@subverted.org wrote: > Normally I don't take to the skies with this sort of thing, but this was > ridiculous. In what I am sure was a well-intentioned change, cryptsetup > recently silently lost its default USE=static status. For one of the > many people

[gentoo-dev] Arbitrary breakage: sys-fs/cryptsetup

2012-03-22 Thread schism
Normally I don't take to the skies with this sort of thing, but this was ridiculous. In what I am sure was a well-intentioned change, cryptsetup recently silently lost its default USE=static status. For one of the many people actually using cryptsetup in an initrd, this came as a lovely surprise