On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 06:24:51PM +0200, Thomas Sachau wrote:
> Petteri R??ty schrieb:
> > Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either
> >> over profiles or via IUSE
> >> +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE
>
Alistair Bush schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i would like to start a discussion about reducing the amount of
>> default-enabled USE flags in profiles, especially in inherited basic
>> profiles.
>
> Sounds like a reasonable idea to me, for the base profiles at least.
Sure. If we have a desktop/kde subpro
Petteri Räty schrieb:
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over
>> profiles or via IUSE
>> +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE flags
>> on every user including
>> more dependencies, more compile time, m
Sebastian Pipping schrieb:
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
>> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over
>> profiles or via IUSE
>> +flag).
>
> I'm not sure for how much of the IUSE="+foo" cases this applies but I
> can explain one of them:
>
> In xfce-base/xfce4-session
El vie, 23-10-2009 a las 22:54 +0300, Petteri Räty escribió:
> Thomas Sachau wrote:
> >
> > In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over
> > profiles or via IUSE
> > +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE
> > flags on every user incl
> Hi,
>
> i would like to start a discussion about reducing the amount of
> default-enabled USE flags in profiles, especially in inherited basic
> profiles.
Sounds like a reasonable idea to me, for the base profiles at least.
> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (ei
Thomas Sachau wrote:
>
> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over
> profiles or via IUSE
> +flag). Whats the reason for forcing a big load of default enabled USE flags
> on every user including
> more dependencies, more compile time, more wasted disk space and
Thomas Sachau wrote:
> In addition, i see a trend to enabled more more more USE flags (either over
> profiles or via IUSE
> +flag).
I'm not sure for how much of the IUSE="+foo" cases this applies but I
can explain one of them:
In xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.6.1-r1 there is +fortune in IUSE
bec
Hi,
i would like to start a discussion about reducing the amount of default-enabled
USE flags in
profiles, especially in inherited basic profiles.
Is there any policy, when they are added, how the reason for addition is
documented and when they
are removed from profiles?
In addition, i see a t
