Domen Kožar said:
> This should probably be updated:
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml#flash
Thanks for noticing this. Everybodies input makes Gentoo a great place to
be!
Now, if you want that extra chocolate chip cookie, please head over to
https://bugs.gentoo.org and rep
This should probably be updated:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-amd64-faq.xml#flash
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 15:58 +0200, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> On 18-06-2010 12:16, Alec Warner wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Lars Wendler
> > wrote:
> >> Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 03:42:29 schrie
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 03:58:22PM +0200, Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> Why? You are running a free and opensource operating system, what's
> wrong suggesting *other* free and opensource alternatives? You are just
> providing the user a choice, not to actually oblige him to install anything.
Some of us
On 18-06-2010 12:16, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Lars Wendler wrote:
>> Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 03:42:29 schrieb Brian Harring:
>>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Lars Wendler wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arri
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Lars Wendler wrote:
> Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 03:42:29 schrieb Brian Harring:
>> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Dale wrote:
>> > Lars Wendler wrote:
>> > > Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano:
>> > >> On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Rams
Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 03:42:29 schrieb Brian Harring:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> > Lars Wendler wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano:
> > >> On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > >>> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> > >
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Dale wrote:
Lars Wendler wrote:
Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano:
On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
One notable sectio
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 05:14:16PM -0500, Dale wrote:
> Lars Wendler wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano:
> >
> >> On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> >>
> >>> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> One notable section is 7.6 in which Adobe rese
Am Freitag 18 Juni 2010, 00:37:29 schrieb Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn:
> Dale schrieb:
> > One notable section is 7.6 in which Adobe reserves the right to
> > download and install additional Content Protection software on the
> > user's PC.
>
> Not like anyone will actually
Dale schrieb:
One notable section is 7.6 in which Adobe reserves the right to
download and install additional Content Protection software on the
user's PC.
Not like anyone will actually *read* the license before adding it to
their accept group, but if they did this would indeed be an important
t
Lars Wendler wrote:
Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano:
On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
I propose that this license be added to the EULA group. The previous
AdobeFlash-10 license is similar in this regard, an
Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano:
> On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> >> I propose that this license be added to the EULA group. The previous
> >> AdobeFlash-10 license is similar in this regard, and could possibly
> >> also
On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>> I propose that this license be added to the EULA group. The previous
>> AdobeFlash-10 license is similar in this regard, and could possibly
>> also be added to that group.
>
> Agreed, on both points, and done. Thank
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> I propose that this license be added to the EULA group. The previous
> AdobeFlash-10 license is similar in this regard, and could possibly
> also be added to that group.
Agreed, on both points, and done. Thanks for finding and airing this
issue!
> One nota
Hi,
www-plugins/adobe-flash has a new license[1] which refers to itself as
"License Agreement" and in section 1.2 "BINDING AGREEMENT" states that
the user must accept the agreement in order to use the software.
I propose that this license be added to the EULA group. The previous
AdobeFlash-1
15 matches
Mail list logo
