On 2014-02-05 00:13, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i don't see any patches in rsync-3.1.0. i'd be hesitant to add support for
> them even if they were there ...
They're in a different tarball [1], and yes I agree that it would be
best to use epatch_user or similar.
Tim
[1]: http://rsync.samba.org/ft
On Tuesday, February 04, 2014 22:25:00 Jauhien Piatlicki wrote:
> 04.02.14 20:53, Donnie Berkholz написав(ла):
> > On 12:48 Tue 28 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
> >> Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33 Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
> >>> net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patc
04.02.14 20:53, Donnie Berkholz написав(ла):
> On 12:48 Tue 28 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
>> Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33
>> Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
>>
>>> net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
>>> can be useful for some users. I think it would be ni
On 12:48 Tue 28 Jan , Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33
> Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
>
> > net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
> > can be useful for some users. I think it would be nice to have them
> > handled automatically by port
Dnia 2014-01-28, o godz. 11:59:33
Jauhien Piatlicki napisał(a):
> net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
> can be useful for some users. I think it would be nice to have them
> handled automatically by portage using e.g. USE_EXPAND.
>
> Of course these patches ca
Hi,
net-misc/rsync upstream provides a tarball with additional patches that
can be useful for some users. I think it would be nice to have them
handled automatically by portage using e.g. USE_EXPAND.
Of course these patches can be just picked by user an applied using
epatch_user, but I think it w
