On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 13:01:52 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/30/2012 12:42 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> > That might be neat, but it would already help if you had to add
> > --allow-downgrades or similar to emerge in case Portage wants to
> > downgrade one or more packages.
> > Besides preventin
On 06/30/2012 11:33 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag 30 Juni 2012, 13:22:39 schrieb Zac Medico:
>> On 06/30/2012 04:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> I would like to discuss a bit more issues like:
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423087
>>>
>>> Even if there are "a lot" of package
On 06/30/2012 12:42 PM, Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> That might be neat, but it would already help if you had to add
> --allow-downgrades or similar to emerge in case Portage wants to
> downgrade one or more packages.
> Besides preventing an accidental downgrade it would raise the
> awareness of the p
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 20:33:35 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> Am Samstag 30 Juni 2012, 13:22:39 schrieb Zac Medico:
> > On 06/30/2012 04:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > > I would like to discuss a bit more issues like:
> > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423087
> > >
> > > Even if the
Am Samstag 30 Juni 2012, 13:22:39 schrieb Zac Medico:
> On 06/30/2012 04:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I would like to discuss a bit more issues like:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423087
> >
> > Even if there are "a lot" of packages that can cause this breakage when
> > downgraded,
El sáb, 30-06-2012 a las 13:46 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 30/06/12 01:30 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > El sáb, 30-06-2012 a las 13:17 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
> >>
> >> On
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/06/12 01:30 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> El sáb, 30-06-2012 a las 13:17 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 30/06/12 11:16 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> On Saturday 30 June 2012 07:22:39 Za
El sáb, 30-06-2012 a las 13:17 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 30/06/12 11:16 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Saturday 30 June 2012 07:22:39 Zac Medico wrote:
> >> On 06/30/2012 04:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >>> I would like to discuss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/06/12 11:16 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 30 June 2012 07:22:39 Zac Medico wrote:
>> On 06/30/2012 04:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> I would like to discuss a bit more issues like:
>>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423087
>>
On Saturday 30 June 2012 07:22:39 Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/30/2012 04:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I would like to discuss a bit more issues like:
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423087
> >
> > Even if there are "a lot" of packages that can cause this breakage when
> > downgraded, I
On 06/30/2012 04:07 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> I would like to discuss a bit more issues like:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423087
>
> Even if there are "a lot" of packages that can cause this breakage when
> downgraded, I think it should be prevented and package managers
> shouldn't tr
I would like to discuss a bit more issues like:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=423087
Even if there are "a lot" of packages that can cause this breakage when
downgraded, I think it should be prevented and package managers
shouldn't try to downgrade this kind of packages as they will later
12 matches
Mail list logo