On Sat, 7 Jul 2012 17:46:49 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Michał Górny
> wrote:
> > To be honest, I think the first thing to do would be fixing the test
> > suites to skip tests which fail due to internet connection being
> > unavailable. Well, there would
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 11:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> To be honest, I think the first thing to do would be fixing the test
> suites to skip tests which fail due to internet connection being
> unavailable. Well, there would still be question how to reliably
> determine that...
For some packages,
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:38:59 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> After reading:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424719
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397973
>
> Looks like there is not consensus about how to handle this cases,
> probably a PROPERTIES variable for this would help :-/
On 8 July 2012 00:38, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> After reading:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424719
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397973
>
> Looks like there is not consensus about how to handle this cases,
> probably a PROPERTIES variable for this would help :-/
>
> Any ideas o
After reading:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424719
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=397973
Looks like there is not consensus about how to handle this cases,
probably a PROPERTIES variable for this would help :-/
Any ideas on this kind of issue?
signature.asc
Description: This
