Re: [gentoo-dev] About ALLARCHES

2017-01-24 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Currently this seems to be resulting in broken deptrees for arches that > don't have a stable profile. arm64 in particular. Last I checked, "ekeyword all foo.ebuild" will skip arches that have no stable profiles. Ago must be using some othe

Re: [gentoo-dev] About ALLARCHES

2017-01-24 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 01/24/2017 11:11 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > Currently this seems to be resulting in broken deptrees for arches that > don't have a stable profile. arm64 in particular. ALLARCHES should not include the unstable ones unless they are specifically in CC, and of course you should be running repom

Re: [gentoo-dev] About ALLARCHES

2017-01-24 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Ühel kenal päeval, T, 24.01.2017 kell 09:55, kirjutas Matthew Thode: > So, to be clear, we need to wait for an AT to mark stable for one > arch > on an ALLARCHES package.  Once that is done any dev can mark the rest > of > the arches stable. Currently this seems to be resulting in broken deptrees

Re: [gentoo-dev] About ALLARCHES

2017-01-24 Thread Matthew Thode
On 01/24/2017 07:54 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > We are working to provide some tools for the stabilization process. > > > > > > Unfortunately, there isn't atm something able to manage the requests > with the ALLARCHES keyword, > > > > So, *everyone* with the commit access can keyword f

[gentoo-dev] About ALLARCHES

2017-01-24 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
We are working to provide some tools for the stabilization process. Unfortunately, there isn't atm something able to manage the requests with the ALLARCHES keyword, So, *everyone* with the commit access can keyword for all after a stabilization/keyword happened at least for one arch. Thanks