Stefan Schweizer ha scritto:
> To my fellow Gentoo Devlopers and Users,
>
> The Gentoo Infrastructure team proposed this idea in june 2006
> * Reduce mirror time for Gentoo specific patches/tarballs
> * Offer an official location for Gentoo specific patches/tarballs
>(Instead of using dev.g.
On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 23:35:50 +0200
Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
I don't quite get the point of your mail ...
Don't even know if it's a proposal, a complaint, a rant, a RFC, ...
Marius
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 11:35:50PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> But I can see that you are a bit frustrated because you did not get your way
> through. So here is a guide of what you can do. I will gladly stop using
> workarounds when I am allowed to have an equally bugfree and fast workflow
>
Stefan Schweizer wrote: [Mon Oct 23 2006, 04:35:50PM CDT]
> To my fellow Gentoo Devlopers and Users,
[lots snipped]
Truly, the sarcasm doesn't help. It takes a potentially reasonable
grievance and reduces it to just the author appearing to be a jerk.
-g2boojum-
--
Grant Goodyear
Gentoo Develo
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
To my fellow Gentoo Devlopers and Users,
The Gentoo Infrastructure team proposed this idea in june 2006
* Reduce mirror time for Gentoo specific patches/tarballs
* Offer an official location for Gentoo specific patches/tarballs
(Instead of using dev.g.o, this would b
To my fellow Gentoo Devlopers and Users,
The Gentoo Infrastructure team proposed this idea in june 2006
* Reduce mirror time for Gentoo specific patches/tarballs
* Offer an official location for Gentoo specific patches/tarballs
(Instead of using dev.g.o, this would be the official place)
* O
