Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-27 Thread Paul Varner
On Thu, 2006-01-26 at 16:55 -0600, MIkey wrote: > Jan Kundrát wrote: > > > Those are bugs against the revdep-rebuild package. > > Which is one of the suggested methods to migrate gcc. Not necessary from > stage1... How does the listing of revdep-rebuild bugs have anything to do with this topic?

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 15:44, Sven Köhler wrote: > >> I'd like to see, that bootstrap.sh unmerges any old gcc > >> (emerge -C \<${gcc package that we just compiled}) > > > > that's a bad idea imo > > let the user decide which gcc they wish to have > > So i understand what you're trying to tel

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Sven Köhler
>> I'd like to see, that bootstrap.sh unmerges any old gcc >> (emerge -C \<${gcc package that we just compiled}) > > that's a bad idea imo > let the user decide which gcc they wish to have So i understand what you're trying to tell me, but bootstrap.sh makes the choice already: bootstrap.sh only

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 11:38, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:23:20 +0100 > Sven Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I'd like to see, that bootstrap.sh unmerges any old gcc > > >> (emerge -C \<${gcc package that we just compiled}) > > > > > > that's a bad idea imo > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Mikey
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 10:38, Marius Mauch spammed: > that sounds rather unlikely, if gcc-3.4 was installed `emerge -e system` > would have rebuilt it, not the 3.3 version (unless there is a dep on > <3.4 in system). Does this have something to do with it? gcc-3.4.4-r1.ebuild: PDEPEND="||

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:23:20 +0100 Sven Köhler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'd like to see, that bootstrap.sh unmerges any old gcc > >> (emerge -C \<${gcc package that we just compiled}) > > > > that's a bad idea imo > > > > let the user decide which gcc they wish to have > > But doesn't bo

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Sven Köhler
>> I'd like to see, that bootstrap.sh unmerges any old gcc >> (emerge -C \<${gcc package that we just compiled}) > > that's a bad idea imo > > let the user decide which gcc they wish to have But doesn't bootstrap.sh rebuild gcc? I have to take a look again, but i think bootstrap.sh rebuilt gcc 3

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 13:30 +0100, Sven Köhler wrote: > Hi, > > bootstrap.sh installs gcc 3.4! So far so good, but gcc 3.3 is not > unmerged. The consequence is, that "emerge -e system" installs gcc 3.4 > and then afterwards gcc 3.3 instead of libstdc++-v3. > > I'd like to see, that bootstrap.sh

Re: [gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 07:30, Sven Köhler wrote: > I'd like to see, that bootstrap.sh unmerges any old gcc > (emerge -C \<${gcc package that we just compiled}) that's a bad idea imo let the user decide which gcc they wish to have > so that a clean system is built with gcc 3.4 only! it wou

[gentoo-dev] bootstrapping since gcc 3.4 is stable

2006-01-25 Thread Sven Köhler
Hi, bootstrap.sh installs gcc 3.4! So far so good, but gcc 3.3 is not unmerged. The consequence is, that "emerge -e system" installs gcc 3.4 and then afterwards gcc 3.3 instead of libstdc++-v3. I'd like to see, that bootstrap.sh unmerges any old gcc (emerge -C \<${gcc package that we just compile