Peter wrote:
To Gentoo nVidia users:
We are in the process of developing and testing
a unified nVidia driver ebuild. When implemented,
it will replace the nvidia-kernel, nvidia-glx, and
nvidia-settings ebuilds. It will also add the utility
nvidia-xconfig.
We would like your help in evaluating
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:49:04PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> I thought that we (gentoo devs) were trying to split the modules from
> ebuilds,
> so that people don't need to waste time with userland when rebuilding modules
> after kernel update.
We are. At least that's the policy
On Friday 23 December 2005 18:41, Peter wrote:
> We would like your help in evaluating, testing, and
> commenting on this approach. Please locate the latest
> nvidia ebuild at:
I thought that we (gentoo devs) were trying to split the modules from ebuilds,
so that people don't need to waste time wi
Since nobody else has asked, I will. What is the point? What problem
are you trying to solve with this ebuild? As far as I can tell, there
is no point, other than trying to sound like you are doing something
important.
I can tell you that I would be disappointed if this replaces the current
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:41:45PM -0500, Peter wrote:
> We are in the process of developing and testing
> a unified nVidia driver ebuild. When implemented,
> it will replace the nvidia-kernel, nvidia-glx, and
> nvidia-settings ebuilds. It will also add the utility
> nvidia-xconfig.
issues:
- pe
To Gentoo nVidia users:
We are in the process of developing and testing
a unified nVidia driver ebuild. When implemented,
it will replace the nvidia-kernel, nvidia-glx, and
nvidia-settings ebuilds. It will also add the utility
nvidia-xconfig.
We would like your help in evaluating, testing, and
c
