[gentoo-dev] Re: to patch or sed was -> repoman and checking for correct quoting

2007-11-11 Thread Steve Long
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 18:36 +0100, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 11:51:37AM +0100, Krzysiek Pawlik wrote: >> > It's purpose is to remove the ${D} from makefile, additionally ${D} is >> > in single quotes, so it will not be expanded - is it a bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: to patch or sed was -> repoman and checking for correct quoting

2007-11-10 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 13:45 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: > William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > > > Now I know some will scream, puke, throw up in their mouth, and so on. > > But seems like sed should have an OPTIONAL argument or etc to tell sed > > to either fail if it can't make the change anywhere. And/

[gentoo-dev] Re: to patch or sed was -> repoman and checking for correct quoting

2007-11-10 Thread Ryan Hill
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > Now I know some will scream, puke, throw up in their mouth, and so on. > But seems like sed should have an OPTIONAL argument or etc to tell sed > to either fail if it can't make the change anywhere. And/or keep/output > a count of how many things were modified. you