On Saturday 24 December 2005 03:43, Duncan wrote:
> Jason Stubbs posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
>
> below, on Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:22:06 +0900:
> > A quick patch makes symlinks handled similarly to regular files and
> > solves the issue. I'll put it into testing unless anybody can come up
>
Duncan wrote:
It just sounds like it /could/ be dangerous to me. For some reason, I
don't like the idea of something that could hose a system that badly! =8^\
It won't hose your system badly, since you've got /usr/lib64 listed in
/etc/ld.so.conf. I agree it wouldn't be very nice though.
--
Jason Stubbs posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
below, on Sat, 24 Dec 2005 02:22:06 +0900:
> A quick patch makes symlinks handled similarly to regular files and
> solves the issue. I'll put it into testing unless anybody can come up
> with a reason not to. The case that will be broken by the p
