Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: pending dooooooom of use.defaults

2006-01-13 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>According to previous posts, USE_ORDER will be going away with >>use.defaults, because that was really the only reason it was there in the >>first place as there's no other sane ordering possible, if it is removed. > > > There are other sane order

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: pending dooooooom of use.defaults

2006-01-13 Thread Harald van Dijk
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 04:39:38PM -0700, Duncan wrote: > Harald van Dijk posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted > below, on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:49:42 +0100: > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:57:24AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre relea

[gentoo-dev] Re: pending dooooooom of use.defaults

2006-01-13 Thread Duncan
Harald van Dijk posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:49:42 +0100: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 06:57:24AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> as one of the new sane features of the next portage-2.1_pre release, we're >> looking to cut out use.defaults support > > Could y