On Sunday 20 November 2005 06:49 am, Lares Moreau wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 04:29 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> > If the capacity is there, go RAID6 (dual parity RAID5, so two drives can
> > drop out without the thing dieing) with a hot-spare as well, so
> > threex146GB usable.
>
> Is RAID6 productio
On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 07:49:11 -0700 Lares Moreau
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 04:29 -0700, Duncan wrote:
| > If the capacity is there, go RAID6 (dual parity RAID5, so two
| > drives can drop out without the thing dieing) with a hot-spare as
| > well, so threex146GB usable.
|
|
On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 04:29 -0700, Duncan wrote:
> If the capacity is there, go RAID6 (dual parity RAID5, so two drives can
> drop out without the thing dieing) with a hot-spare as well, so
> threex146GB usable.
Is RAID6 production ready?
--
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | LRU: 400755 http://
Robin H. Johnson posted
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:44:41 -0800:
> The 6x146GB is overkill for storage, unless you have some other plans
> that I'm not aware of (I'm assuming RAID5 with a hot-spare, so 4x146GB
> usable). 6x72GB might be more suitable for the budge
