On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:02:45 +0300
Peter Volkov wrote:
> I'm not sure here. Is it safe to export src_prepare function for
> EAPI=0,1?
Nope. You're only allowed to EXPORT_FUNCTIONS something that's a phase
function for your chosen EAPI.
(Incidentally, you're also only allowed to call EXPORT_FUNCT
В Чтв, 12/03/2009 в 21:02 +0100, Alex Legler пишет:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.txt
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~a3li/ruby/gems.eclass.diff
You have:
EXPORT_FUNCTIONS src_unpack src_prepare src_configure src_compile src_install
I'm not sure here. Is it safe to export src_prepare f
On Fr, 2009-03-06 at 21:03 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> In the case that USE_RUBY is set to something funky, it never gets handled.
> The eclass
> basically just does nothing. This might be what you want, but if not, how
> about something
> like:
>
Actually, this is what we want. ;)
I noticed a
On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:47:58 +0100
Alex Legler wrote:
> Hey,
>
> we have some changes to be made in gems.eclass for Ruby 1.9.1.
> Basically this introduces the possibility to install gems for multiple
> versions of Ruby.
>
> If anyone feels like reviewing, please review the following
> changes:
