Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass proposal - savedconfig.eclass

2007-02-02 Thread Ned Ludd
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 04:08 +, Duncan wrote: > Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 01 Feb 2007 > 20:46:41 +0100: > > > sys-kernel/*? Or perhaps genkernel? Being able to build kernel images just > > like any other package in Gentoo would be ni

[gentoo-dev] Re: eclass proposal - savedconfig.eclass

2007-02-02 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:16:11 -0500: > i'd say no myself ... or you'd have to add RESTRICT=interactive to the > eclass Good point! -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: eclass proposal - savedconfig.eclass

2007-02-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 01 February 2007, Duncan wrote: > But with make oldconfig, so the user gets asked about new options, and > those get saved back to the savedconfig, right? i'd say no myself ... or you'd have to add RESTRICT=interactive to the eclass -mike pgpskbKKCx4pW.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: eclass proposal - savedconfig.eclass

2007-02-01 Thread Duncan
Thomas Rösner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:46:41 +0100: > sys-kernel/*? Or perhaps genkernel? Being able to build kernel images just > like any other package in Gentoo would be nice. But with make oldconfig, so the user gets asked about ne