[gentoo-dev] Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))

2009-03-13 Thread Duncan
Michael Higgins posted 20090313140558.048bb...@lappy.evolone.org, excerpted below, on Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:05:58 -0700: > Example? After months of searching for a reason, after seeing many > apparently random updates to a previously stable tree of perl modules, I > happen to keep an IRC session l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))

2009-03-13 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 15:37 Fri 13 Mar , Duncan wrote: > Thilo Bangert posted > 200903101315.52142.bang...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Mar > 2009 13:15:36 +0100: > > > the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available via > > IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a projec

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))

2009-03-13 Thread Thomas Anderson
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 03:37:28PM +, Duncan wrote: > Thilo Bangert posted > 200903101315.52142.bang...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Mar > 2009 13:15:36 +0100: > > > the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available via > > IRC. it has long been my feeling that Ge

[gentoo-dev] Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))

2009-03-13 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net>: > Thilo Bangert posted > 200903101315.52142.bang...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 > Mar 2009 13:15:36 +0100: > > > the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available > > via IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a project c

[gentoo-dev] Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))

2009-03-13 Thread Duncan
Thilo Bangert posted 200903101315.52142.bang...@gentoo.org, excerpted below, on Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:15:36 +0100: > the presumption seems to be, that as a dev one has to be available via > IRC. it has long been my feeling that Gentoo as a project could realize > more of its potential by better in