Peter Faraday Weller posted
1241642515.3120.16.ca...@localhost.localdomain, excerpted below, on Wed,
06 May 2009 21:41:54 +0100:
>> Maybe dead projects are cleaned like treecleaners ?
>
> This actually sounds like a pretty good idea, and one that I might
> actually be interested in.
>
> Someon
Sergio D. RodrÃguez Inclan posted
f01ff58b0905050926o74ddf373l85a1c49a6a32...@mail.gmail.com, excerpted
below, on Tue, 05 May 2009 12:26:23 -0400:
> Could be a good idea publish a status of each Gentoo project and see
> what is needed, so the users/devs can offer some help.
Actually, the variou
Ferris McCormick posted
20090504114734.30329...@anaconda.krait.us, excerpted below, on Mon, 04
May 2009 11:47:34 +:
> For what it's worth (probably not much) I think Foundation is
> functioning now. At least, we are legal again, have bylaws, and a real
> bank account.
I should have stated
On Sun, 3 May 2009 18:51:59 -0400
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Peter Faraday Weller posted
> 1241385973.4028.67.ca...@localhost.localdomain, excerpted below, on Sun,
> 03 May 2009 22:26:13 +0100:
>
> > On a more serious note, the problem seems to be the complete lack of
> > management
Peter Faraday Weller posted
1241385973.4028.67.ca...@localhost.localdomain, excerpted below, on Sun,
03 May 2009 22:26:13 +0100:
> On a more serious note, the problem seems to be the complete lack of
> management in the required places, Gentoo is fast becoming (or more
> likely, already is) an a
