Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:33:55 -0500:
> This sort of e-mail isn't particularly helpful[.] You might get better
> results if you [...] ask for clarification based on what you
> think you know. Here's an example: "That las
Steev Klimaszewski wrote: [Tue Apr 17 2007, 08:58:59AM CDT]
> Bryan Østergaard wrote:
>
> >On the contrary we warn people about not behaving badly and if that
> >doesn't help despite many warnings and complaints being filed we finally
> >take to firmer action which is exactly what have happened in
Bryan Østergaard wrote:
On the contrary we warn people about not behaving badly and if that
doesn't help despite many warnings and complaints being filed we finally
take to firmer action which is exactly what have happened in this case.
Regards,
Bryan Østergaard
Sorry, I am going to have to
On 4/17/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resigning from this project.
>
OMG NO! Please reconsider.
> I'm pret
Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resigning from this project.
>
OMG NO! Please reconsider.
> I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, sin
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:35:01PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> I just hope we are not going to get overly 'precious' about this CoC thing,
> which btw, I note contains the colloquial phrase 'If you screw up ...'.
> That sort of lazy slang language has no place in the official document set
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 01:34:02PM +0100, Steve Long wrote:
>
> > I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, since those
> > folks that contributed to my retirement far outweigh the benefit I
> > could ever possibly be to this project. This can be clearly evidenced
> > by their long-l
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:54:31PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> You might find reading the Debian, and particularly, the Ubuntu Code of
> Conduct a worth-while execise.
> http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct
> http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
Yeah, that one has already
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 23:42:36 Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:35:01PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > I just hope we are not going to get overly 'precious' about this CoC
> > thing, which btw, I note contains the colloquial phrase 'If you screw
> > up ...'. That sort of
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 22:32:34 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
> > > So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> > > brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this proje
Petteri Räty wrote:
>
> You can still set a watch to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Better:
you can take your account back in 2 weeks, in the mean time please have
a vacation, think about ways to not get too annoyed by people in dummy
mode (like me and others from time to time) and please don't be angry
beca
Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
> > So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> > brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any
> > more. I'm therefore resigning from this project.
> I would
Jakub Moc kirjoitti:
> On 4/17/07, Bryan Østergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:01:46AM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>> >
>> > Whoever is in charge, kindly change my bugzilla account to the email
>> > address this mail is sent from and take care of the setting the
>> > bugzi
On 4/17/07, Bryan Østergaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:01:46AM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> Whoever is in charge, kindly change my bugzilla account to the email
> address this mail is sent from and take care of the setting the
> bugzilla privs accordingly. There's still
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:01:46AM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
>
> Whoever is in charge, kindly change my bugzilla account to the email
> address this mail is sent from and take care of the setting the
> bugzilla privs accordingly. There's still a couple of bugs I've filed
> and maybe someone will tak
Tach Tim, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Tim Yamin schrieb:
> So long, and thanks for all the fish...
Even I hope you rethink it...
V-Li
--
Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3
http://www.gnupg.org/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 3 Aug 2006 08:58:32 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| The point is as valid now as it was 3 years ago. We accept that
| developers leave and don't care.
I guess you've not been following Gentoo development as of late.
Current policy is that developers leaving is grounds to
On Monday 31 July 2006 10:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:10:45 +0200 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> | > Good intentions and trying to be helpful don't keep users or
> | > developers. Screwups lose users and developers.
> |
> | It's re
maillog: 31/07/2006-09:21:51(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
>
> No, what's funny is watching people do nothing when Sunrise really is
> making developers leave.
Did I miss someone's resignation, or was the plural "developers" an
exaggeration.
--
\Georgi Georgiev \ Amy: "What about Umbriel
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 10:10:45 +0200 Simon Stelling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Good intentions and trying to be helpful don't keep users or
| > developers. Screwups lose users and developers.
|
| It's really funny to hear such a statement from a person who made
| several
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Good intentions and trying to be helpful don't keep users or
> developers. Screwups lose users and developers.
It's really funny to hear such a statement from a person who made several great
developers leave the project.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Deve
On Monday 31 July 2006 02:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> I don't have a perfect solution, no. Unfortunately, knowing why one
> thing won't work doesn't automatically let you know what will.
and knowing what does/doesnt work comes a lot from experience, not solely
making conjectures about how we thi
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:10:52 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Britney Spears being the Sunrise Developers and the evacuees being..
| a bunch of packages that have no relevance whatsoever since they're
| copies of ebuilds already in bugzilla? When Britney crashes and
| burns the ebuilds
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:22:33 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list?
|
| You know, that was a completely unnecessary personal attack. God
| forbid anyone take the time to attemp
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:22:33 -0600 Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky"
| > | This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual
| > | Gentoo developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1].
|
| > Did you look
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:20:16 -0500 "Alex Tarkovsky"
| This "no QA" accusation is a complete myth. QA led by actual Gentoo
| developers is indeed in place at Sunrise [1].
Did you look at *which* actual Gentoo developers are on the list?
You know, that was a completely u
26 matches
Mail list logo
