On 6/19/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 06:01 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
>> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> > Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
>> > piece of software. We're not debian.
>>
>> Could you clarify whet
On Tuesday 19 Jun 2007 4:19:49 am Steve Long wrote:
>
> Er what? Some of us don't wish to be "at the mercy of" anyone, especially
> not some corporation nicking VOIP. That's why we use GNU software.
>
I don't understand this attitude. Do you really have to bash everything that
you do not use? Do y
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
If the Gentoo developers as a whole decided to dedicate this list to
pink ponies, we can.
Are pretty purple ponies acceptable as well?
--
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/
Gentoo Linux Developer Catalyst/Installe
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 23:49 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> Oh I see, when it's
> stuff *you* care about, it's development. Cool.
That's sort of the point, isn't it? Developers are here mostly to
scratch their own respective itches -- so, by necessity, we talk about
stuff we care about.
signature.a
On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 23:49 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> >> Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
> >> licensing issue? If the latter case, this discussion should prob'y go to
> >> the new -project ml if and when, or indeed the user forums.
> >
> > The "problem" wi
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 06:01 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
>> Stephen Bennett wrote:
>> > Not everyone sees that as a reason not to use a potentially useful
>> > piece of software. We're not debian.
>>
>> Could you clarify whether this is indeed a Gentoo QA issue, or in fact a
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> It is neither a QA nor license issue, its an issue of the download being
>> unavailable. Please read the full thread.
> And to reply to myself - its a licensing issue since we cannot mirror
> the distfile.
Er thanks for that ;)
> However, I hardly find that "facist" -
