On Sunday 07 October 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 01:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 October 2007, George Shapovalov wrote:
> > > Tuesday, 2. October 2007, Roy Marples Ви написали:
> > > > And here it is
> > >
> > > - if [[ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]];
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 01:09 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007, George Shapovalov wrote:
> > Tuesday, 2. October 2007, Roy Marples Ви написали:
> > > And here it is
> >
> > - if [[ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]]; then
> > + if [ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]; then
>
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Tuesday, 2. October 2007, Roy Marples Ви написали:
> > And here it is
>
> - if [[ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]]; then
> + if [ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]; then
>
> You know, it is funny to see these lines after all those cries abo
On 03-10-2007 09:40:02 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> > Although, I have to ask: what is so terrible about installing GNU findutils?
> > Personally I'd just build in a chroot if the pollution were that bad.
> > (AFAICT the whole point of GNU stuff is to have a consistent Free
> > foundation. But like
On 10/2/07, Alex Tarkovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/2/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I accept the argument for initscripts, since an embedded system is not
> > > likely to have bash. But for compile-time (which shouldn't happen on an
> > > embedded target) there simply i
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 01:55 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> If you have the patches and can make it work consistently on all gentoo
> platforms, imo you should just do a custom find for gentoo. Distributing it
> to users won't be an issue, and by standardising here you can prove the
> benefits, while sa
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 19:29 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Steve Long wrote:
> > IMO the real reason you have such an issue with quoting is the redundant
> > braces which are Gentoo house style; too many newbie scripters think that
> > cd ${S} is safe when it should be cd "${S}" or more simply cd "$S".
Steve Long wrote:
> IMO the real reason you have such an issue with quoting is the redundant
> braces which are Gentoo house style; too many newbie scripters think that
> cd ${S} is safe when it should be cd "${S}" or more simply cd "$S". I don't
> buy the legibility argument since most people use
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 17:02 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> > wrong. bash and GNU prevail because they provide useful extensions.
>> > it may be worthwhile to force `find` in the portage environment to be
>> > GNU find so we can stop wasting time tryin
On 10/2/07, Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I accept the argument for initscripts, since an embedded system is not
> > likely to have bash. But for compile-time (which shouldn't happen on an
> > embedded target) there simply isn't any real benefit to end-users that I
> > can see.
>
> The
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 18:30 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Tuesday, 2. October 2007, Roy Marples Ви написали:
> > And here it is
> - if [[ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]]; then
> + if [ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]; then
>
> You know, it is funny to see these lines after all those cri
Tuesday, 2. October 2007, Roy Marples Ви написали:
> And here it is
- if [[ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]]; then
+ if [ "${FORTRANC}" = "gfortran" ]; then
You know, it is funny to see these lines after all those cries about how [ is
evil and we should really never ever use it but rathe
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 15:18 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
> Attached is a patch to make it posix sh.
And here it is
Index: molden-4.6.ebuild
===
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/sci-chemistry/molden/molden-4.6.ebuild,v
retrieving revisio
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 13:36 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> ++ There's just too much nice stuff in BASH to drop down to sh to my mind. I
> for one would go right off Gentoo if i were forced to write ebuilds in sh.
I had this chat with Donnie last night and he pulled the molden ebuild
of the top of his
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Duncan wrote:
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
>
> Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:28:30 +0100:
> > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 06:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> i am convinced by superior standards and by good things. forcing the
>
On 10/2/07, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
> Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:28:30 +0100:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 06:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> i am convinced by superior standards and by good things. forcing th
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:28:30 +0100:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 06:57 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> i am convinced by superior standards and by good things. forcing the
>> standard from bash to POSIX is neither of these. i
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
>> I like consistency too, and I'll be pushing for using sh instead of
>> forcing bash.
>
> pushing a new standard by slowly converting the tree is not the way to go.
>
>> My motivation? Simple. I don't believe that the porta
Roy Marples wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 08:35 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
>> After a quick look I wonder how/if it deals with:
>>
>> 1.01 < 1.1
>
> It treats them the same way
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ bash -c '. /usr/portage/eclass/versionator.eclass;
> version_compare 1.01 1.1; echo $?'
>
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:26:39 +0100:
>> > > but I find interesting that
>> > > you ripped Ciaran's copyright while leaving the "Prod ciaranm if
>> > > you find something it can't handle" comment.
>> >
>> > I copied and past
20 matches
Mail list logo
