Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-08 Thread Jim Ramsay
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400 > Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying > > though: Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In > > theory some users would find this and just CC t

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-07 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400 Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though: > Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In theory some > users would find this and just CC themselves on it. Other users could > be shushed w

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-07 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 15:33 +, Duncan wrote: > Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], > excerpted below, on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400: > > > Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though: > > Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-07 Thread Duncan
Jim Ramsay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Mon, 07 Jul 2008 10:10:14 -0400: > Here's an interesting solution for those who find it annoying though: > Just file your own 0-day bump request in bugzilla. In theory some users > would find this and just CC themselves

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-04 Thread Tiziano Müller
Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:26:13AM +0100, Tony Chainsaw Vroon wrote: >> Just an idea: >> How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump requests >> are welcome? It's more of an individual developer preference, but that >> seems the right place for it. > If

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-03 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hi, "Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > How about a metadata.xml tag that indicates whether early bump > requests are welcome? It's more of an individual developer > preference, but that seems the right place for it. This fixes a non-problem. Why overload metadata.xml with informat

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-03 Thread Sven Köhler
I'd like to add a few words from the users perspective: - 1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request? I hope developers are not annoyed - well, sometimes the words chosen are maybe a bit too offensive. I like these bump requests. I add myself as a CC and wait for

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: 0-day bump requests

2008-07-03 Thread Duncan
"Tony \"Chainsaw\" Vroon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:26:13 +0100: >> 2) If you had your way, would you discourage users from filing early >> version bump requests? AFAIK, it has been at least informal policy to discourage bump requests