Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo vmware/virtualbox/qemu images

2007-09-24 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 13:54 +0200, Ramon van Alteren wrote: > > Currently, Release Engineering is quite understaffed. We have lost a > > few release coordinators between the last release and now. The arch > > teams are picking up the slack and getting people to fill the roles, but > > they have t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo vmware/virtualbox/qemu images

2007-09-24 Thread Ramon van Alteren
Chris, Chris Gianelloni wrote: Currently, Release Engineering is quite understaffed. We have lost a few release coordinators between the last release and now. The arch teams are picking up the slack and getting people to fill the roles, but they have to be trained, which means more time spent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo vmware/virtualbox/qemu images

2007-09-22 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2007-09-22 at 07:19 +0100, Steve Long wrote: > This guy: http://gentoovm.blogspot.com/ works for vmware according to his > first post here: http://www.vmwhere.net/category/gentoo/ (where he makes > clear he has nothing to do with releng, and that his work is in no way to > be seen as offici

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo vmware/virtualbox/qemu images

2007-09-21 Thread Steve Long
Mike Doty wrote: >> I don't get this obsession with a "live image" when someone can boot the >> LiveCD/LiveDVD on real hardware *or* in VMware. They can even boot the >> ISO directly and not even have to burn to disk, so people without a DVD >> burner can still use the LiveDVD. So exactly what pr