Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its a good idea, but since our users don't
> always provide useful reports, it seems like we are just shifting work
> around.
I'd suggest that this would /spread/ work around - Instead of a few
folks wrangling bugs, everyone would be doing it.
That said, I
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> So this is now the third revision of this proposal.
>
> The first two editions are available here.
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601
>
> Comments are welcome, as are off
So this is now the third revision of this proposal.
The first two editions are available here.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/48485
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/49601
Comments are welcome, as are offers to implement it.
Implementations should be a small pyt
