W dniu pon, 30.10.2017 o godzinie 19∶56 +, użytkownik Robin H.
Johnson napisał:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:51:36PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> ...
> > Directory tree coverage
> > ---
>
> This section should maybe cover OPTIONAL in more detail (see more
> below).
So I've
Am Mittwoch, 1. November 2017, 09:44:09 CET schrieb Michał Górny:
> Hi,
>
> Ok, so before we get into this deeper, here's another option we've been
> discussing. Let's drop the non-strict mode entirely, drop OPTIONAL
> and keep MISC as deprecated-used-to-have-special-meaning alias to DATA.
>
> Th
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:44:09AM +0100, Micha?? Górny wrote
> All that said, if we really have a problem that needs solving here, I'm
> not convinced MISC is the right solution for it. If people need to
> explicitly exclude stuff, then I suppose the configuration-injected
> ignore list is much b
Hi,
Ok, so before we get into this deeper, here's another option we've been
discussing. Let's drop the non-strict mode entirely, drop OPTIONAL
and keep MISC as deprecated-used-to-have-special-meaning alias to DATA.
This is going to make a lot of things simpler, and avoid having the very
long disc
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:51:36PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
...
> Directory tree coverage
> ---
This section should maybe cover OPTIONAL in more detail (see more
below).
> The Manifest files can also specify ``IGNORE`` entries to skip Manifest
> verification of subdirectories
Here's another version with a few clarification-class changes:
62819e2 glep-0074: Clarify OPTIONAL desc
e953eaf glep-0074: Add two example files for reference
f98cabc glep-0074: Reorganize to have tag references after basic algos
56b06b0 glep-0074: Rewrite the file verificaton to cover OPTIONAL
bb
