Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-15 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Robert Buchholz wrote: >> 1. has no DTD/xml validation schema > > I'd like to be part of the schema creation process [..] First try on a DTD and Relax NG schema for Layman's current overlays.xml format (used in layman-global.txt) over here: http://git.goodpoin

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-13 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Sonntag, 12. Juli 2009, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > "vdr-xine-overlay", # vdr-xine Fixed to be vdr-xine. Zzam

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-13 Thread Zhang Le
On 15:53 Sun 12 Jul , Sebastian Pipping wrote: > The output produces line like > > MISMATCH "gentoo-china" (layman-global) versus "china" (repo_name) > I have just changed gentoo-china overlay's repo_name to gentoo-china. -- Zhang, Le Gentoo/Loongson Developer http://zhangle.is-a-geek.or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Sebastian Pipping
So here's the current result of my analysis: == Format: "", # Entries: "maekke's overlay", # maekke "kde", # kde-testing ERROR: Overlay "lordvan" lacks repo_name entry ERROR: Overlay "rox" lacks repo_name entry ERROR: Ov

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Sunday 12 July 2009, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Robert Buchholz wrote: > > 1. has no DTD/xml validation schema > > I'd like to be part of the schema creation process but feel that > having pre-mature schema's on the list and it's archives is not a > good idea. It's probably wise not to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Robert Buchholz wrote: > 1. has no DTD/xml validation schema I'd like to be part of the schema creation process but feel that having pre-mature schema's on the list and it's archives is not a good idea. If we had a schema file: where would we store it? Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Robert Buchholz
On Sunday 12 July 2009, Fabian Groffen wrote: > since I assume you can't reliably use the checked out version of the > overlay (by e.g. layman), can you try to retrieve the repo_name file > from the overlay? Probably a lot of efforts. So alternative, what > if we extend the layman-global.txt (whi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Sebastian Pipping wrote: > I'll try to create a map for all overlays in layman-global.txt as a next > step. Layman and shell tools should help with that. Believe it or not: discs space issues disallow me to have an answer already. The code is there, I just cannot checkout all overlays at the sam

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Fabian Groffen wrote: > So alternative, what if > we extend the layman-global.txt (which is xml in reality...) file with > an extra property per overlay which holds the contents of it's > repo_name? Good idea. I'll try to create a map for all overlays in layman-global.txt as a next step. Layman

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Ben de Groot
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> Problem > >> When the name from repo_name and the overlay name in layman-global.txt >> do not match smolt would assume the overlay is secret though it's not >> and not be able to send in stats about it. > > I understand your pr

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-12 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 12-07-2009 01:59:03 +0200, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Proposal > > - Make repo_name file fit layman-global.txt entry where it doesn't > match at the moment > > - People with that overlay installed do not have to change > anything, no "where did that overlay go" mail

Re: [gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-11 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Hello! > > > Intro > > For the gentoo-specific part of smolt [1] that's in the making we > collect stats on what package is installed and what overlay it comes > from. Which tree/overlay it came from is determi

[gentoo-dev] [rfc] repo_name/layman-global.txt overlay name mismatches

2009-07-11 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hello! Intro For the gentoo-specific part of smolt [1] that's in the making we collect stats on what package is installed and what overlay it comes from. Which tree/overlay it came from is determined by reading file /var/db/pkg/${CATEGORY}/${PF}/repository. The name in there comes fr