Le mercredi 05 septembre 2007 à 11:38 +0200, Matthias Schwarzott a
écrit :
> > Having usb devices as root:root 644 is going to be a PITA if we don't
> > have something like a sane pam_console (one that doesn't change all /dev
> > nodes whenever someone logs in over ssh, like the one we used to have
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 10:54:19AM +0200, Joerg Bornkessel wrote:
> Guten Tag ,
>
> am Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 um 10:34 schrieben Sie:
>
>
> >> > 6. lp
> >> > Used for all *lp* and parport devices with MODE=660
> >> > Upstream uses it same way.
> >> Might be a place for scanner usage, but CU
On Mittwoch, 5. September 2007, Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Maybe some of those groups could be merged (cdrom, cdrw) or dropped
> (tape maybe?)
>
I guess this is ok, as for normal burning cdrom for now does grant all
permissions.
Only questionable thing is: Isn't a user with write permission to cdroms a
Guten Tag ,
am Mittwoch, 5. September 2007 um 10:34 schrieben Sie:
>> > 6. lp
>> > Used for all *lp* and parport devices with MODE=660
>> > Upstream uses it same way.
>> Might be a place for scanner usage, but CUPs for modern printing runs as
>> a daemon, users should not need the lp access.
>
On 9/5/07, Robin H. Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:34:05AM +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> > So here we are:
> > In udev git-gtree suse and redhat rules are already merged.
> > But they use a different permission / group system than we have, they have
> > less g
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:34:05AM +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
> So here we are:
> In udev git-gtree suse and redhat rules are already merged.
> But they use a different permission / group system than we have, they have
> less groups and assign some desktop permissions via pam_console.
Might
Maybe some of those groups could be merged (cdrom, cdrw) or dropped
(tape maybe?)
Having usb devices as root:root 644 is going to be a PITA if we don't
have something like a sane pam_console (one that doesn't change all /dev
nodes whenever someone logs in over ssh, like the one we used to have
did
Hi there!
As you all know up to now we have our very own rules file 50-udev.rules
This is good for getting our specials - but bad from maintainance view.
So here we are:
In udev git-gtree suse and redhat rules are already merged.
But they use a different permission / group system than we have, th
