Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] removal of /etc/dev.d - cleanup of /etc/udev/rules.d/

2007-03-20 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Donnerstag, 15. März 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > Hi fellows! > > 1. I am going to remove the legacy call of /etc/dev.d from our default > udev-rules. > > # always run /etc/dev.d/ stuff for now. > #RUN+="udev_run_devd $env{SUBSYSTEM}" > > If I get no votes against, this will happen on 2007

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] removal of /etc/dev.d - cleanup of /etc/udev/rules.d/

2007-03-18 Thread Georgi Georgiev
maillog: 18/03/2007-10:57:01(+0100): Matthias Schwarzott types > On Donnerstag, 15. März 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > > Hi fellows! > > > > > > 2. I think we should get udev rules directory (/etc/udev/rules.d/) a bit > > more cleaned up. > > > > At the moment a lot of packages install their f

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] removal of /etc/dev.d - cleanup of /etc/udev/rules.d/

2007-03-18 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
On Donnerstag, 15. März 2007, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: > Hi fellows! > > > 2. I think we should get udev rules directory (/etc/udev/rules.d/) a bit > more cleaned up. > > At the moment a lot of packages install their files prefixed with 99. > I does not like that, and in the future that should pe

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] removal of /etc/dev.d - cleanup of /etc/udev/rules.d/

2007-03-15 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
Hi fellows! 1. I am going to remove the legacy call of /etc/dev.d from our default udev-rules. # always run /etc/dev.d/ stuff for now. #RUN+="udev_run_devd $env{SUBSYSTEM}" If I get no votes against, this will happen on 2007/03/20. Only ebuilds still installing stuff there are (found via grep)