On Sun, 2007-02-25 at 16:42 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:22:34 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > | In order to do this, selected profile specific flags should be
> > | masked in th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:22:34 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | In order to do this, selected profile specific flags should be
> | masked in the base profile and unmasked/forced in the specific
> | profiles which
On Sat, 2007-02-17 at 15:22 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> We can make this change to the profiles immediately because use.mask
> support has been available for a long time, and use.force is simply
> ignored by older versions of portage. Thoughts?
If this is done, will anyone who makes such changes t
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 15:22:34 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| In order to do this, selected profile specific flags should be
| masked in the base profile and unmasked/forced in the specific
| profiles which they apply to. The unmasking is necessary because
| use.mask currently overrid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
If we mask and force various profile specific USE flags
appropriately, it will give repoman the information it needs to stop
producing bogus warnings about unsatisfied conditional dependencies
that are actually irrelevant. An additional
