On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 20:11 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> sparc-solaris
> sparc64-solaris
> x64-solaris
> x86-solaris
> Perhaps using KEYWORDS for Prefix keywords is not the best thing to do,
> and should we use something like PREFIX_KEYWORDS?
Maybe there is one thing w
Fabian Groffen wrote:
Most notably, in Prefix all keywords are full GLEP53 style, which
results in e.g. amd64-linux. We did this on purpose, because in Prefix
we don't necessarily are on Gentoo Linux. We also chose to expand fbsd,
nbsd and obsd to their long variants, mainly because the short
On Thu, 2008-10-09 at 20:11 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> ia64-hpux
There's one thing to say for this platform to avoid later confusion:
'ia64-hpux' is the keyword for 32bit on that platform.
'ia64w-hpux' would be the 64bit keyword (not in prefix-tree yet).
This might seem confusing, bu
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:11:01 +0200
Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> amd64-linux
> x64-openbsd
> x64-solaris
Is there a special reason why you're using "x64" instead of "amd64" in
those cases? (IMO x64 is the most stupid name for the x86_64
architecture)
Marius
Hi all,
In the Prefix project we support a bunch of Linux and non-Linux
platforms, for which we use GLEP53-style[1] keywords. The current list
of keywords known in Prefix are (in no particular order):
ppc-aix
x86-freebsd
ia64-hpux
hppa-hpux
x86-interix
