On 20/12/2021 09.05, Anna “CyberTailor” wrote:
On 2021-12-20 01:18, Jonas Stein wrote:
I think we need a more precise definition if we do not want this.
"servers for miscellaneous application-level network protocols"?
sounds like server-misc/* what is the benefit?
https://xkcd.com/1077/
I d
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2021, Jonas Stein wrote:
>> I've been packaging some Gemini protocol servers and clients in ::guru
>> overlay, and they all go to net-misc category. I think it would be
>> better to split browsers and servers for non-www protocols (like Finger,
>> Ident, Gemini and Gopher) int
Hi,
I've been packaging some Gemini protocol servers and clients in ::guru
overlay, and they all go to net-misc category. I think it would be
better to split browsers and servers for non-www protocols (like Finger,
Ident, Gemini and Gopher) into separate categories.
all servers without www ser
