La 07.01.2024 14:48, Michał Górny a scris:
Hi,
I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
could be:
Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.
Potential candidates include:
dev-util/rr would be a good candidate too.
Regards,
Viorel
On 10/01/2024 12.01, Sam James wrote:
Florian Schmaus writes:
[[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
On 07/01/2024 13.48, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The
description
could be:
Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.
Seems sensible. I'd proba
Florian Schmaus writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On 07/01/2024 13.48, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The
>> description
>> could be:
>>Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.
>
> Seems sensible. I'd probably drop the "Code" f
On 07/01/2024 13.48, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
could be:
Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.
Seems sensible. I'd probably drop the "Code" from the description, since
packages like d-spy do not primarily debug code
On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 13:20 +, Sam James wrote:
> >
> > This was originally prompted by bug 920438 [1], pointing out that LLDB
> > and GDB belong to the same category. dev-util/ currently carries 428
> > packages, so I suppose it makes sense to split it some more, especially
> > when we can c
Michał Górny writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
> could be:
>
> Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.
Sounds good.
>
> Potential candidates include:
>
> [...]
dev-util/seer as well would be a good fi
Hi,
I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
could be:
Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.
Potential candidates include:
dev-util/ald: Assembly Language Debugger
dev-util/apitrace: Tool for tracing, analyzing, and debugging graphics APIs
dev-util/bpftrace:
