Rémi Cardona kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty a écrit :
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a57bf5f459324975bae8843fe7cdf469.xml
Sorry I didn't respond to you Petteri, but this is clearly missing
packages. For sure, it's missing gnome-games which inherits both the
gnome2 and the games eclasse
Tuesday, 18 of March 2008 07:43:35 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> Bo Ørsted Andresen a écrit :
> > On Tuesday 18 March 2008 00:42:02 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> >>> Now, basically, if the portage metadata or QA people could tell me a
> >>> way to figure *all* the ebuilds that inherit gnome2 *and* have a
Bo Ørsted Andresen a écrit :
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 00:42:02 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Now, basically, if the portage metadata or QA people could tell me a way
to figure *all* the ebuilds that inherit gnome2 *and* have a
pkg_preinst() function somewhere (either in the ebuild or in an eclass
Petteri Räty a écrit :
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_a57bf5f459324975bae8843fe7cdf469.xml
Sorry I didn't respond to you Petteri, but this is clearly missing
packages. For sure, it's missing gnome-games which inherits both the
gnome2 and the games eclasses. So I made the assumptio
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 00:42:02 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
> > Now, basically, if the portage metadata or QA people could tell me a way
> > to figure *all* the ebuilds that inherit gnome2 *and* have a
> > pkg_preinst() function somewhere (either in the ebuild or in an eclass
> > somewhere) I'd
Rémi Cardona kirjoitti:
Now, basically, if the portage metadata or QA people could tell me a way
to figure *all* the ebuilds that inherit gnome2 *and* have a
pkg_preinst() function somewhere (either in the ebuild or in an eclass
somewhere) I'd really appreciate it, as I really don't want to r
Le lundi 17 mars 2008 à 17:32 +0100, Rémi Cardona a écrit :
[snip]
> Now, basically, if the portage metadata or QA people could tell me a way
> to figure *all* the ebuilds that inherit gnome2 *and* have a
> pkg_preinst() function somewhere (either in the ebuild or in an eclass
> somewhere) I'd
Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit :
Shouldn't this function be
gnome2_pkg_preinst() {
:
}
? Because bash chokes on empty functions..
I was actually planning on using a bogus debug-print statement :) but
thanks for letting me know.
Rémi
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:02 PM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> [1] The Patch (tm)
>
> --- gnome2.eclass 10 Feb 2008 14:47:14 - 1.83
> +++ gnome2.eclass 17 Mar 2008 16:30:31 -
> @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@
> rm -fr "${D}/usr/share/applications/mimein
Hi again,
I've just come up with a plan for the new eclass based on previous
feedback. Basically, I want to commit this patch [1] ASAP.
If I commit this right now here's what's going to happen :
- ebuilds that use the gnome2 eclass and other eclasses that don't
export pkg_preinst() will be
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:20:15 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> David Leverton a écrit :
> > Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that
> > ebuilds can be updated now, instead of suddenly all at once as soon as the
> > new eclass is committed?
>
> Good idea, I'll see what I ca
David Leverton kirjoitti:
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:14:39 Petteri Räty wrote:
David Leverton kirjoitti:
Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that
ebuilds can be updated now, instead of suddenly all at once as soon as
the new eclass is committed?
And break a bunch
David Leverton a écrit :
On Friday 14 March 2008 07:14:23 Rémi Cardona wrote:
- the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
_games_eclass_ is one of those.
Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the
On Friday 14 March 2008 12:14:39 Petteri Räty wrote:
> David Leverton kirjoitti:
> > Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that
> > ebuilds can be updated now, instead of suddenly all at once as soon as
> > the new eclass is committed?
>
> And break a bunch of ebuilds t
Rémi Cardona kirjoitti:
This is where I kindly request the help of fellow Gentoo devs and PM
developers :
- the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple inherits,
make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The _games_eclass_ is
one of those.
I only found two ebuilds to
David Leverton kirjoitti:
On Friday 14 March 2008 07:14:23 Rémi Cardona wrote:
- the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
_games_eclass_ is one of those.
Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the
On Friday 14 March 2008 07:14:23 Rémi Cardona wrote:
> - the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
> inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
> _games_eclass_ is one of those.
Maybe worth adding a dummy to the current version of the eclass so that
ebuilds
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you remove from that list vlc, pidgin and celestia which are false
> > positives, that leaves us:
>
> Why are they false positives? They include the gnome2 eclass and other
> stuff, I guess they'll be affected too.
Denis Dupeyron a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
_games_eclass_ is one of those.
[...]
*Please* review these eclass
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - the gnome2 eclass now has a pkg_preinst, if you do multiple
> inherits, make sure that gnome2_pkg_preinst is called too. The
> _games_eclass_ is one of those.
[...]
> *Please* review these eclasses because with a simp
Hi folks,
During the past few weeks, I've been working on fixing and improving the
Gnome2 eclasses wrt bug #155993. We plan on pushing these eclasses to
portage before the Great Gnome 2.22 Unmask so that users can start
benefiting from the improvements during the upgrade to 2.22.
URL :
http
21 matches
Mail list logo
