Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:04:31 -0500
> Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
>> idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
>> Council-driven projects.
>
> How about unified (a
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 16:04:31 -0500
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
> idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
> Council-driven projects.
How about unified (and enforced) rules about Manifest
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 08:10:22 +1100
Daniel Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While hanging around lca07 it was mentioned how bandwidth hungry
> Gentoo is.
>
> Given a lot of the world is still on dialup this could increase the
> potential userbase for Gentoo.
>
> As such the project idea is A
While hanging around lca07 it was mentioned how bandwidth hungry Gentoo is.
Given a lot of the world is still on dialup this could increase the potential
userbase for Gentoo.
As such the project idea is Automated Xdelta Generation.
principles:
no manual generation of xdeltas by gentoo devs
sim
sanchan wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
>
>> And ultimately, it's a waste of QA's time. There are far more severe
>> breakages and there are not many people in QA.
>
> That's why I proposed this for a small targeted project.
It was my interpretation that the benefit of a council driven non-
Ciaran McCreesh ha scritto:
> And ultimately, it's a waste of QA's time. There are far more severe
> breakages and there are not many people in QA.
That's why I proposed this for a small targeted project.
--
Sandro (sanchan)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:48:14 +0100 sanchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Chris Gianelloni wrote:
| > Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing
| > one idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
| > Council-driven projects.
|
| A simple QA review of the en
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
> idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
> Council-driven projects.
A simple QA review of the entire portage tree, fixing any trivial QA concern
like missing headers inclusion,
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
> idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
> Council-driven projects.
packages.g.o is a really helpful tool - which could be even more helpful
if there where so
gt; From: Simon Stelling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:24 PM
> To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ideas for projects...
>
> I like the idea. Something really useful I could think of is *drums*
>
> the implementation
On 1/11/07, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 12 January 2007 05:43, Richard Fish wrote:
> My idea would be to extend emaint to check package.keywords and
> package.use for obsolete flags, unnecessary atoms (like foo-1.2 in
> keywords when foo-1.3 is stable), atoms that don'
On Friday 12 January 2007 05:43, Richard Fish wrote:
> My idea would be to extend emaint to check package.keywords and
> package.use for obsolete flags, unnecessary atoms (like foo-1.2 in
> keywords when foo-1.3 is stable), atoms that don't match any current
> ebuild, and so on.
app-portage/eix al
On 1/11/07, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Gentoo Council is looking for some ideas for some small projects
that we could initiate that would help Gentoo.
My idea would be to extend emaint to check package.keywords and
package.use for obsolete flags, unnecessary atoms (like foo
Simon Stelling wrote:
> I like the idea. Something really useful I could think of is *drums*
>
> the implementation of GLEP 42.
>
GLEP 42 is almost fully implemented and is currently undergoing local
testing (by me) to find the last of the obvious bugs.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
assigning tasks
for the implementation of ALL approved GLEPs.
Maybe GLEP 42 could be the pilot. :-)
Jason Huebel
-Original Message-
From: Simon Stelling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2007 4:24 PM
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Ide
I like the idea. Something really useful I could think of is *drums*
the implementation of GLEP 42.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Developer
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Submit your ideas here, so we can discuss them. I will be choosing one
idea that we think we can accomplish to test out the idea of
Council-driven projects.
Construction of a dynamic website for tracking kernel security issues.
There are too many of them and too many k
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:04:31PM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> Robin Johnson came up with a good example, which was "genflags" an
> application that was to gather information from the running system and
> spit out a customized set of C(XX)FLAGS for the user.
I should clarify, that genflags was
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
The Gentoo Council is looking for some ideas for some small projects
that we could initiate that would help Gentoo. These project ideas
should be things that are attainable in a measurable amount of time, and
should be fairly small in scope. This would be in the same vei
The Gentoo Council is looking for some ideas for some small projects
that we could initiate that would help Gentoo. These project ideas
should be things that are attainable in a measurable amount of time, and
should be fairly small in scope. This would be in the same vein as the
Google Summer of
20 matches
Mail list logo
