On 6/13/07, Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want a gentoo-kindergarten list, where useless discussions like this
(sub)thread can be directed to.
kids, grow up!
*cries in his corner*
Yes mummy
:]
--
Kent
ruby -e '[1, 2, 4, 7, 0, 9, 5, 8, 3, 10, 11, 6, 12, 13].each{|x|
print "enNO
I want a gentoo-kindergarten list, where useless discussions like this
(sub)thread can be directed to.
kids, grow up!
pgpJFDJFTgIVf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Doty wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
Kumba wrote:
Kumba wrote:
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself
and others (i.e., mcummi
Mike Doty wrote:
George Prowse wrote:
Kumba wrote:
Kumba wrote:
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself
and others (i.e., mcummi
George Prowse wrote:
> Kumba wrote:
>> Kumba wrote:
>>>
>>> So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
>>> flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
>>> IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself
>>> and others (i.e., mcu
Kumba wrote:
Kumba wrote:
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself
and others (i.e., mcummings) to get back on track and actual
Kumba wrote:
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself and
others (i.e., mcummings) to get back on track and actually like, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kumba wrote:
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
>> We might need some sort of enforcement for that particular purpose.
>> While I think that "behavior" proctors are inappropriate, I think that
>> people with ability to say "move this thread to gentoo-p
Kumba wrote:
> gentoo-politics
> gentoo-circuits
> gentoo-soap
> gentoo-project
> gentoo-gossip
gentoo-drama - theatrical events every day, no feeling were hurt while
filming the show*
gentoo-chats - mindless discussions about non issues
gentoo-rhetorics - exercise your language skills
gentoo-p
Kumba wrote:
> >> what should we call it? Vote on this!
> >
> > If users have votes ...
Then I'd vote for gentoo-project.
It seems to me that politics covers just a part of all possible non-technical
topics. Depends on how you define politics though.
Roman
pgpUqVXAIRKN3.pgp
Description: PGP
Philip Webb wrote:
070607 Kumba wrote:
what should we call it? Vote on this!
If users have votes ...
Since I'm pretty much the pikachu-loving nutball that proposed this, I don't see
why not. Users are as much a part of Gentoo as the developers are.
--Kumba
--
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead
"S
070607 Kumba wrote:
> what should we call it? Vote on this!
If users have votes ...
> gentoo-politics
... that gets mine: let's keep it quite clear what it is.
--
,,
SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb : [EMAIL PROTECT
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
We might need some sort of enforcement for that particular purpose.
While I think that "behavior" proctors are inappropriate, I think that
people with ability to say "move this thread to gentoo-politics or else.."
for non-technical threads, as well as "stop failin
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
>>> Marius Mauch wrote:
Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an
>> honest question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have
>> serious doubts about it. It's of no u
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> > Marius Mauch wrote:
> >> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an
> honest question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have
> serious doubts about it. It's of no use if people have to be told to
> move
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:50:02 -0500
> Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we
>> can't have that, no sir.
>
> It's censorship when it's being done one-sidedly in order to skew an
> argument base
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:50:02 -0500
> Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we
>> can't have that, no sir.
>>
>
> It's censorship when it's being done one-sidedly in order to skew an
> a
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 11:50:02 -0500
Steev Klimaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No can do - temporarily banning is a bad thing, its censorship, and we
> can't have that, no sir.
It's censorship when it's being done one-sidedly in order to skew an
argument based upon the prejudices of those doin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> Marius Mauch wrote:
>> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an honest
>> question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have serious doubts
>> about it. It's of no use if people have t
070607 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh wrote:
> people with ability to say "move this to gentoo-politics or else.."
> for non-technical threads, as well as "stop failing to use logic
> in your technical discussion or else..." with power
> to temporarily ban people for non-compliance could be a useful thi
Marius Mauch wrote:
> Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an honest
> question, maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have serious doubts
> about it. It's of no use if people have to be told to move threads from -dev
> to that new list.
>
We might need some sort
Marius Mauch wrote:
Do you really think people would voluntarily use it? That's an honest question,
maybe people are fair enough to do it, but I have serious doubts about it. It's
of no use if people have to be told to move threads from -dev to that new list.
Most of what I wrote was tongue
Luca Barbato wrote:
I'm ok with it, just I'd like to have it available as gentoo-fortune please.
(btw I'd like to see the quotebot back from the old ages!)
Oh, I could easily see the quote package for gentoo-politics (or whatever its
called) raising much laughter (among other things).
And
Christian Parpart wrote:
+1 here too
possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
confused with net-im/gossip )
gentoo-soap, lol!
"And these are the Flames of our Lives..."
--Kumba
--
Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:19:55 -0400
Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the flames
> burn
> bright enough to have earned a star designation from the IAU. Given what's
> been
> going on lately, and with calls from myself and oth
Kent Fredric wrote:
> possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
> confused with net-im/gossip )
Please, please, make it gentoo-circuits [1].
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_My_Circuits
Yours faithfully,
-jkt
--
cd /local/pub && more beer > /dev/mouth
signature.
On Thursday 07 June 2007 09:10:41 Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 6/7/07, Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyways, thoughts?
> >
> > --Kumba
>
> +1
+1 here too
> possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
> confused with net-im/gossip )
gentoo-soap, lol!
signature.asc
Des
Kumba wrote:
> So anyways, I'm all for this list, humour aside. It's blatantly obvious
> people need a place to vent at times, and I think that by separating the
> politics from the technical discussion, it might help in some way. Yes,
> it'll also be the source of many problems too. I can't env
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kumba wrote:
> And maybe a dev who
> secretly dabbles in another OSlike Wind...err, Ubuntu!
I thought this position has been already filled :)
- --
Vlastimil Babka (Caster)
Gentoo/Java
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux
On 6/7/07, Kumba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anyways, thoughts?
--Kumba
+1
possible alternative names: gentoo-soap, gentoo-gossip ( not to be
confused with net-im/gossip )
And just for fits and giggles, the occasional person can start a fake
flame war just to keep us on our toes as to whats
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kumba wrote:
>
> So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the
> flames burn bright enough to have earned a star designation from the
> IAU. Given what's been going on lately, and with calls from myself and
> others (i.e., mcum
So I'm told debian has one of these types of MLs, probably where the flames burn
bright enough to have earned a star designation from the IAU. Given what's been
going on lately, and with calls from myself and others (i.e., mcummings) to get
back on track and actually like, you know, develop s
32 matches
Mail list logo
