Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> On Monday 27 August 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
>> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443
>>
>> It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented?
>
> i bet if you posted a patch it'd get done quicker
> -mike
I would do so if i had any python skills ;)
For me as
On Monday 27 August 2007, Daniel Pielmeier wrote:
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443
>
> It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented?
i bet if you posted a patch it'd get done quicker
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110443
>
Thanks!
It looks rather old! Why isn't it implemented?
Regards,
Daniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Daniel Pielmeier kirjoitti:
> Hi!
>
>>From time to time i recognize that ebuilds are committed straight to
> stable into the gentoo tree, especially for version bumps where no
> changes in the ebuild are required. It also happens to me when providing
> ebuilds via bugzilla!
>
> So what about addi
Hi!
>From time to time i recognize that ebuilds are committed straight to
stable into the gentoo tree, especially for version bumps where no
changes in the ebuild are required. It also happens to me when providing
ebuilds via bugzilla!
So what about adding a repoman check to cover this. If a ebui
