On Wed, 1 May 2013 22:42:05 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> To make this more friendly, I would likely to locally introduce
> 'edefault' function in the eclass (name can change). The function would
> -- similarly to 'default' in regular phase functions -- call
> the default code for the sub-phase.
I
Hi, everyone.
This one goes to gentoo-dev since it's a potentially wider idea
and I'd like to get other developers opinion on.
As you most likely already know, distutils-r1 allows ebuilds to define
sub-phase functions like:
python_compile() {
# commands which will be run for each impl
