On 7/25/2018 1:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu śro, 25.07.2018 o godzinie 01∶28 -0400, użytkownik Joshua Kinard
> napisał:
>> On 7/8/2018 2:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Replace the 'Gentoo subkey' term that might wrongly suggest that
>>> the developers are expected to create an additional, de
> On Wed, 25 Jul 2018, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> The whole, "I am not doing one year..." and then the "anvil doesn't
> count" seems uncooperative and contradictory.
> Is there some obstacle stopping you from updating your key
> expiration once a year? It takes at most 20 minutes.
It is *not* one
On July 25, 2018 1:28:52 AM EDT, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>On 7/8/2018 2:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Replace the 'Gentoo subkey' term that might wrongly suggest that
>> the developers are expected to create an additional, dedicated subkey
>> for Gentoo.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Kristian Fiskerstrand
W dniu śro, 25.07.2018 o godzinie 01∶28 -0400, użytkownik Joshua Kinard
napisał:
> On 7/8/2018 2:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Replace the 'Gentoo subkey' term that might wrongly suggest that
> > the developers are expected to create an additional, dedicated subkey
> > for Gentoo.
> >
> > Suggest
On 7/8/2018 2:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Replace the 'Gentoo subkey' term that might wrongly suggest that
> the developers are expected to create an additional, dedicated subkey
> for Gentoo.
>
> Suggested-by: Kristian Fiskerstrand
> ---
> glep-0063.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Replace the 'Gentoo subkey' term that might wrongly suggest that
the developers are expected to create an additional, dedicated subkey
for Gentoo.
Suggested-by: Kristian Fiskerstrand
---
glep-0063.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/glep-0063.rst b/glep-0063.r
