On 19/06/2024 10.32, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
Any preference regarding the auto-formatting tool? The
readme.gentoo-r1.eclass uses fold, but fmt (both are in coreutils)
would probably also be an option (and has a --uniform-spacing option
;)).
readme.ge
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> Any preference regarding the auto-formatting tool? The
> readme.gentoo-r1.eclass uses fold, but fmt (both are in coreutils)
> would probably also be an option (and has a --uniform-spacing option
> ;)).
readme.gentoo.eclass originally had fmt, bu
On 18/06/2024 20.21, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
On 18/06/2024 17.53, Florian Schmaus wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. I think I understand now what arthur is
asking for:
src_install() {
...
local DOC_CONTENTS="My README.Gentoo contents"
readme.gentoo_create_doc
}
@arthur: is that
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 09:21:56PM +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> On 18/06/2024 17.53, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> > On 18/06/2024 16.02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> > Finally, unlike readme.gentoo-r1.elcass, this eclass does not need
> > to st
On 18/06/2024 17.53, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> On 18/06/2024 16.02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> Finally, unlike readme.gentoo-r1.elcass, this eclass does not need
> to store the content of the readme in an environment variable. Not
> having
On 18/06/2024 16.02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 18 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
Finally, unlike readme.gentoo-r1.elcass, this eclass does not need
to store the content of the readme in an environment variable. Not
having to store the content in an environment variable reduces the
pollutio
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>>> Finally, unlike readme.gentoo-r1.elcass, this eclass does not need
>>> to store the content of the readme in an environment variable. Not
>>> having to store the content in an environment variable reduces the
>>> pollution of the environment (s
Hi Arthur,
thanks for your mail.
On 16/06/2024 20.15, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
On 16/06/2024 18.51, Florian Schmaus wrote:
This new eclass includes various improvements over the existing
readme.gentoo-r1.eclass.
So, some weird question from me - why is it called greadme? I can
understand why yo
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> First, the content of README.gento will only be shown on new
Typo.
> +greadme_pkg_postinst() {
> + debug-print-function ${FUNCNAME} "${@}"
> +
> + if [[ ! -v _GREADME_SHOW ]]; then
> + die "_GREADME_SHOW not set. Did you cal
On 16/06/2024 18.51, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> This new eclass includes various improvements over the existing
> readme.gentoo-r1.eclass.
So, some weird question from me - why is it called greadme? I can
understand why you don't want to modify existing eclass, but why not
call it "readme.gentoo-r2.
This new eclass includes various improvements over the existing
readme.gentoo-r1.eclass.
First, the content of README.gento will only be shown on new
installations or if it has changed between updates.
Second, it allows the composition of readme via bash's heredoc.
Third, it exports phase functi
11 matches
Mail list logo
