Ulrich Mueller writes:
>> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Sam James wrote:
>
>> -if ! has test "$IUSE"; then
>> +if ! has test ${IUSE}; then
>
> You cannot reliably test for a flag in IUSE with code like this.
> PMS defines the function in_iuse() for this (unless the above is
> in global scope,
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2023, Sam James wrote:
> - if ! has test "$IUSE"; then
> + if ! has test ${IUSE}; then
You cannot reliably test for a flag in IUSE with code like this.
PMS defines the function in_iuse() for this (unless the above is
in global scope, in which case you're out of luck).
I was looking at the generated metadata for nokogiri and noticed several
instances of 'test' in IUSE & RESTRICT. Ended up finding that the quoting
of 'IUSE' in has is wrong here.
This isn't explicitly wrong, but it's a bit ugly in the generated metadata,
and I'm not convinced Portage handles dupli
