Dnia 2013-07-24, o godz. 09:18:13
Michał Górny napisał(a):
> Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that do
> not work anymore without systemd.
Committed with a little more verbose description, and a MERGE_TYPE note.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Descri
El mié, 24-07-2013 a las 11:34 -0400, Ian Stakenvicius escribió:
> On 24/07/13 10:33 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> >
> > Runtime warnings would require non-trivial patching of the
> > packages in question, so it's not a realistic alternative.
> >
>
> It should be done anyways, though, unless
Dnia 2013-07-24, o godz. 16:17:47
Ulrich Mueller napisał(a):
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that
> > do not work anymore without systemd.
>
> Why is the host where the package is built required to run system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/07/13 10:33 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
>
> Runtime warnings would require non-trivial patching of the
> packages in question, so it's not a realistic alternative.
>
It should be done anyways, though, unless the runtime errors
themselves
On 24/07/13 10:33 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:17 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>>> Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that
>>> do not work anymore without systemd.
>>
>> Why is the host wh
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 16:17 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that
> > do not work anymore without systemd.
>
> Why is the host where the package is built required to run systemd?
> W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 24/07/13 10:17 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages
>> that do not work anymore without systemd.
>
> Why is the host where the package is b
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013, Michał Górny wrote:
> Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that
> do not work anymore without systemd.
Why is the host where the package is built required to run systemd?
Wouldn't a warning at runtime better suit the purpose?
Ulrich
Dnia 2013-07-24, o godz. 11:36:12
Sergei Trofimovich napisał(a):
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:18:13 +0200
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>
> > +# @FUNCTION: systemd_is_booted
> > +systemd_update_catalog() {
>
> Looks like a typo :]
Thanks for noticing. Does anyone else feel that eclassdoc is utterly
ir
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:18:13 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> +# @FUNCTION: systemd_is_booted
> +systemd_update_catalog() {
Looks like a typo :]
--
Sergei
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:18:13 +0200
Michał Górny wrote:
> Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that
> do not work anymore without systemd.
>
> +# @FUNCTION: systemd_is_booted
> +# @DESCRIPTION:
> +# Check whether the system was booted using systemd.
Can we have a short
Pacho requested that to be able to warn users in GNOME packages that do
not work anymore without systemd.
---
gx86/eclass/systemd.eclass | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gx86/eclass/systemd.eclass b/gx86/eclass/systemd.eclass
index 166c7be..a2750d7 100644
---
12 matches
Mail list logo
