Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-2.eclass 1/2] Clean up non-bare checkout before updating.

2012-01-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 23 December 2011 16:49:46 Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:09:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395247 > > > > > > + git clean -d -f -x || die "${FUNCNAME}: failed to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-2.eclass 1/2] Clean up non-bare checkout before updating.

2011-12-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:09:26 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395247 > > > + git clean -d -f -x || die "${FUNCNAME}: failed to > > clean checkout dir" + > > Why should there be untracked

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-2.eclass 1/2] Clean up non-bare checkout before updating.

2011-12-23 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Michał Górny wrote: > Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395247 > + git clean -d -f -x || die "${FUNCNAME}: failed to clean > checkout dir" > + Why should there be untracked files, in the first place? (In the "steps to reproduce" of bug 395247

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH git-2.eclass 1/2] Clean up non-bare checkout before updating.

2011-12-23 Thread Michał Górny
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=395247 --- eclass/git-2.eclass |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/git-2.eclass b/eclass/git-2.eclass index f1ed79f..4f0b65b 100644 --- a/eclass/git-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/git-2.eclass @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ gi